ProofReal AnalysisIntermediateProof Builder

Epsilon-delta proof that

This proof is common because it shows the standard move in early analysis: factor the expression, then bound the extra factor by forcing into a smaller interval first.

Primary Tool

Proof Builder

Open proof builder

The proof is easier to understand when the bound-setting steps stay in order: choose , control , and then estimate . Seeing those moves line by line makes the logic easier to track.

The key move

The hard part is not the factorization. The hard part is controlling the factor in a way that only depends on a fixed neighborhood around .

Choosing gives , which in turn gives . That converts the expression into something proportional to alone.

Why the minimum appears

The choice is not decorative. One part keeps in a region where is bounded, and the other part makes the final estimate smaller than .

This is the pattern students should remember: use one bound to control a troublesome factor, and another bound to satisfy the final target.

Common Pitfall

Factoring is only the start. You still have to control with a fixed bound, otherwise the estimate does not finish the proof.

Try a Variation

Try adapting the same proof to show . Which constants change, and which part of the argument stays identical?

Related Pages

Keep moving through the cluster

Back to Learn Math →